Green v. Lamanna

166 F. App'x 96
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 13, 2006·No. No. 05-7444·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Green, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, without prejudice, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Therefore, although we grant the motion to amend, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Green v. LaManna, No. CA-05-737-18BD (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. Lamanna, 166 F. App'x 96 (4th Cir. 2006).

166 F. App'x 96 (Green v. Lamanna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241