Green v. LaManna
This text of Green v. LaManna (Green v. LaManna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7444
CHRISTOPHER GREEN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-05-737-18BD)
Submitted: January 13, 2006 Decided: February 13, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Green, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Christopher Green, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)
petition, without prejudice, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2000). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Therefore,
although we grant the motion to amend, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Green v. LaManna, No. CA-05-737-18BD
(D.S.C. Mar. 10, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Green v. LaManna, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-lamanna-ca4-2006.