Green v. Kootenai Heart Clinics LLC

• Court: District Court, E.D. Washington
• Decided: March 27, 2020
• Docket: 2:19-cv-00400
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Mar 27, 2020 4 5 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 9 JOSEPH B GREEN, individually, and as 10 Personal Representative of the Estate of NO. 2:19-CV-00400-SAB 11 Kari Anna Green, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION 13 v. FOR LEAVE TO AMEND 14 KOOTENAI HEART CLINICS, LLC.; COMPLAINT AND REMAND 15 KOOTENAI HOSPITAL DISTRICT, TO STATE COURT 16 d/b/a Kootenai Health, d/b/a Kootenai 17 Heart Clinics; HEIDI SIIRILA; THE CITY 18 OF SPOKANE; THE STATE OF 19 WASHINGTON; THE WASHINGTON 20 STATE DEPARTMENT OF 21 TRANSPORTATION; and CPM 22 DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a/k/a 23 Inland Asphalt Company, and JOHN 24 DOES; 25 Defendants. 26 27 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and 28 Remand to State Court, ECF No. 23. Plaintiff moves to amend the complaint, 1 naming non-diverse Defendants the City of Spokane, the State of Washington, and 2 CPM Development Corporation. Id. As joinder of these defendants would defeat 3 diversity, the basis for this Court’s jurisdiction over this matter, Plaintiff moves to 4 remand. Defendant does not object to either the amended complaint or the motion 5 to remand, and for the reason’s stated below, the Court grants both motions. 6 Plaintiff’s original complaint, filed in the Superior Court of the State of 7 Washington for Spokane County, alleges that Defendants Kootenai Heart Clinics, 8 LLC, Kootenai Hospital District, and Heidi Siirila (“Idaho Defendants”) 9 negligently caused the death of decedent Kari Anna Green after an 10 automobile/pedestrian collision in Spokane. ECF No. 1. The Idaho Defendants 11 removed this case on the basis of diversity. Id. Plaintiff was at all relevant times a 12 resident of Washington, and each of the originally named Defendants are residents 13 of Idaho. Id. 14 In their Answer, the Idaho Defendants identified the City of Spokane as a 15 potentially liable nonparty. ECF No. 6. Plaintiff submitted a notice of claim to the 16 City of Spokane, and in response to the notice of claim, the City of Spokane 17 identified the Washington State Department of Transportation (“WSDOT”) as an 18 additional potentially liable nonparty. ECF No. 23. Id. Plaintiff submitted a Notice 19 of Claim to the State of Washington, which tendered the claim to a Washington 20 company, CPM Development Company, d/b/a Inland Asphalt Company. Id. 21 Plaintiff moves to amend the complaint with leave of the Court under Fed. 22 R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), and name the City of Spokane, WDOT, and CPM 23 Development Company (“Washington Defendants”) as additional Defendants. Id. 24 The Idaho Defendants do not object to this amendment, ECF No. 22, and the Court 25 finds that leave to amend is proper, as there is no indication of bad faith, undue 26 delay, prejudice to the opposing party, or post-amendment futility. Walters v. 27 Superior Tank Lines Nw. Div., LLC, 2019 WL 3067299, at *1 (W.D. Wash. July 28 12, 2019) (quotation omitted). 1 In this case, because the amendment would operate to join non-diverse Defendants, the Court also considers under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(e) whether: (1) the 3|| parties sought to be joined are necessary parties under Rule 19(a); (2) the statute of limitations would bar a newly filed suit against the new parties; (3) the reason for 5|| the failure to earlier name the defendants; (4) whether the joinder serves only to defeat federal jurisdiction; (5) the validity of the claims against the new parties; and (6) whether denial of joinder will prejudice the plaintiff. See Ritchey v. Upjohn Drug Co., 139 F.3d 1313, 1318 (9th Cir. 1998). After considering these factors, the Court finds that joinder of the Washington Defendants is appropriate. Thus, the amended complaint at ECF No. 23-1 is accepted as the operative complaint in this matter, and this Court remands the matter to the Spokane County Superior Court. U.S.C. § 1447(e). 13 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 14 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and Remand to State 15|| Court, ECF No. 23, and the associated Motion to Expedite, ECF No. 24, are 16| GRANTED. 17 2. Because this Court no longer possesses jurisdiction, Plaintiff’s civil action hereby REMANDED to Spokane County Superior Court under state Cause No. 19-2-04491-32. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is hereby directed to file this Order, provide copies to counsel, CLOSE the file, and REMAND the case 22||to Spokane County Superior Court. 23 DATED this 27th day of March 2020. 24 25 26 Sule Festa 28 Stanley A. Bastian United States District Judge