Green v. Kolur

234 A.D.2d 267, 651 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12721
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 2, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Paul Becker and Frank Dambra appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pollizi, J.), dated April 23, 1996, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a default judgment against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the particular circumstances of this case, the Supreme [268]*268Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion when it granted the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a default judgment against the appellants. The appellants’ answer was stricken by operation of law, because of their failure to comply with a prior conditional order of preclusion of the same court, dated January 8, 1996, which granted the cross motion of the plaintiffs to strike the appellants’ answer unless they submitted to an examination before trial (see, CPLR 3126; see also, Amico v Pepe, 172 AD2d 575). Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. Kolur, 234 A.D.2d 267, 651 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12721 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

234 A.D.2d 267 (Green v. Kolur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kimmel v. State
267 A.D.2d 1079 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Carter v. Hi Top Flower Wholesale Corp.
255 A.D.2d 412 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)