Green v. Kijakazi
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION Civ. No. 4:20-cv-00080-D KYLE GREEN, ) ) : Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) . ANDREW SAUL, ) ORDER Commissioner of Social Security ) ) Defendant. )
Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and upon consideration of Defendant’s unopposed request to remand this cause for further administrative action, the Court hereby reverses Defendant’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remands the case to Defendant for further administrative action. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). SO ORDERED this_ AK day of June, 2021.
ts C. DEVER, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Green v. Kijakazi (Green v. Kijakazi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.