Green v. Hyatt
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1303
THOMAS GREEN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GWEN T. HYATT,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:09-cv-02573-TLW)
Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 25, 2010
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Green, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Thomas Green appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice Green’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Green v. Hyatt, No. 4:09-cv-02573-TLW
(D.S.C. Feb. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Green v. Hyatt (Green v. Hyatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.