Green v. Hyatt

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Green v. Hyatt. Read the opinion of the Court — 385 F. App'x 318
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 25, 2010·No. 10-1303·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1303

THOMAS GREEN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GWEN T. HYATT,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:09-cv-02573-TLW)

Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 25, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Green, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Thomas Green appeals the district court’s order

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing without prejudice Green’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)

civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Green v. Hyatt, No. 4:09-cv-02573-TLW

(D.S.C. Feb. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. Hyatt, (4th Cir. 2010).

Green v. Hyatt (Green v. Hyatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related