Green v. Hodges
This text of 577 F. App'x 234 (Green v. Hodges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Charles Green appeals a jury verdict denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record, including the transcript of the two-day jury trial, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Green v. Deputy Tom Hodges, No. 3:10-cv-03162-JFA (D.S.C. filed Aug. 27, 2013; entered Aug. 28, 2013). We deny Green’s motions for appointment of counsel and to compel disclosure of evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
577 F. App'x 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-hodges-ca4-2014.