Green v. Hempstead Bank

27 A.D.2d 656, 276 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4966
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 26, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 27 A.D.2d 656 (Green v. Hempstead Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green v. Hempstead Bank, 27 A.D.2d 656, 276 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4966 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

Order entered July 11, 1966, herein appealed from, unanimously modified on the law to grant partial summary judgment to appellant in the amount of $1,140.80 and as so modified is otherwise affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to respondent. The parties disagree on the interpretation to be accorded paragraph 52 of a lease executed by and between defendant as tenant and plaintiffs’ predecessor in interest as landlord. The provision in question states in substance that the tenant agrees to pay as additional rent any and all increases of real estate taxes greater than such taxes imposed on the property for the first full year as fully assessed. The taxes originally assessed were later reduced through tax certiorari proceedings. The question involves a construction of the language and the intent of the parties as to whether the' original tax assessed or such tax as subsequently reduced was to represent the base tax upon which the tenant’s additional obligation should be calculated; in other words, what is the basic tax. The defendant tendered the sum of $1,140.80 as the measure of its obligation and the plaintiff refused. Thus under any construction this sum represents an admitted liability and accordingly judg[657]*657ment should be granted for that amount. To that extent there is no triable issue of fact (CPLR 3212). This disposition does not dispose of the basic underlying question of the interpretation to be given paragraph 52. That issue is reserved for trial (see City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. J. & J. Slater, Inc., 303 N. Y. 971). Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Tilzer and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of New York v. State
95 Misc. 2d 810 (New York State Court of Claims, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 A.D.2d 656, 276 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-hempstead-bank-nyappdiv-1967.