Green v. Green

Court of Appeals of Texas

Green v. Green

167 S.W. 263, 1914 Tex. App. LEXIS 511

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 20, 1914

DocketNo. 5296.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 167 S.W. 263 (Green v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. Green, 167 S.W. 263, 1914 Tex. App. LEXIS 511 (Tex. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

FLY, C. J.

This is a suit for divorce and to partition community property, instituted by appellee. The cause was tried without a jury, and judgment was rendered that the parties were never legally married, but that the lots of land were acquired while they “were living together as man and wife, and were acquired by their joint labors, she being in the honest belief that she was his wife.” The divorce was refused, but one-half the property was decreed to appellee.

There are no assignments of error in the record, and no motion for a new trial was filed. There is no basis for the so-called assignment of error found in the brief, which seeks to complain of a finding of the trial judge. There is no fundamental error apparent of record. The right of the innocent wife to one-half of the property acquired during the existence of the putative marriage is well established by decisions of the appellate and Supreme Courts of Texas. Barkley v. Dumke, 99 Tex. 150, 87 S. W. 1147; Railway v. Robertson, 103 Tex. 504, 121 S. W. 202, 131 S. W. 400, Ann. Cas. 1913A, 231; Chapman v. Chapman, 16 Tex. Civ. App. 383, 41 S. W. 533; Lawson v. Lawson, 30 Tex. Civ. App. 43, 69 S. W. 246. We must, in the state of the record, presume that the facts sustain the recitals in the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FLY, C. J.

This is a suit for divorce and to partition community property, instituted by appellee. The cause was tried without a jury, and judgment was rendered that the parties were never legally married, but that the lots of land were acquired while they “were living together as man and wife, and were acquired by their joint labors, she being in the honest belief that she was his wife.” The divorce was refused, but one-half the property was decreed to appellee.

There are no assignments of error in the record, and no motion for a new trial was filed. There is no basis for the so-called assignment of error found in the brief, which seeks to complain of a finding of the trial judge. There is no fundamental error apparent of record. The right of the innocent wife to one-half of the property acquired during the existence of the putative marriage is well established by decisions of the appellate and Supreme Courts of Texas. Barkley v. Dumke, 99 Tex. 150, 87 S. W. 1147; Railway v. Robertson, 103 Tex. 504, 121 S. W. 202, 131 S. W. 400, Ann. Cas. 1913A, 231; Chapman v. Chapman, 16 Tex. Civ. App. 383, 41 S. W. 533; Lawson v. Lawson, 30 Tex. Civ. App. 43, 69 S. W. 246. We must, in the state of the record, presume that the facts sustain the recitals in the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 S.W. 263, 1914 Tex. App. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-green-texapp-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack