Green v. Green

127 A.D.2d 983, 513 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43478
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 27, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 127 A.D.2d 983 (Green v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green v. Green, 127 A.D.2d 983, 513 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43478 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law without costs, and complaint dismissed. All concur, Davis, J., not participating. Memorandum: The trial court erred in granting plaintiff a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. In a marriage of long duration such as this one, a high degree of proof is required to establish cruel and inhuman treatment (see, Brady v Brady, 64 NY2d 339, 345; Hessen v Hessen, 33 NY2d 406, 411-412; Kleindinst v Kleindinst, 116 AD2d 988, 989; Passantino v Passantino, 87 AD2d 973, 974). At trial plaintiff testified that the marriage lacked communication and sexual intimacy, that defendant pushed her a few times causing minor bruises, and, as a result of such conduct, she gained excessive weight. Defendant denied the allegations of fault.

The record establishes, at best, only strained relations and incompatibility which are insufficient to sustain a divorce based on cruel and inhuman treatment (see, Kleindinst v Kleindinst, supra; Buckley v Buckley, 93 AD2d 973, 974; cf., Falcone v Falcone, 112 AD2d 796, 797). Plaintiff presented no medical proof to establish that her health was adversely affected by defendant’s alleged conduct (see, Warguleski v Warguleski, 79 AD2d 1107; Gemayel v Gemayel, 63 AD2d 831, 832). Since the divorce should not have been granted, we need not reach the other claims raised which relate to the trial court’s distribution of the marital property. (Appeals from judgment of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Cicoria, J.— divorce.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gross v. Gross
40 A.D.3d 448 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Matthews v. Matthews
238 A.D.2d 926 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Van Vlack v. Van Vlack
233 A.D.2d 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Gulisano v. Gulisano
214 A.D.2d 999 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Walczak v. WalcZak
206 A.D.2d 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
William MM. v. Kathleen MM.
203 A.D.2d 883 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Urtis v. Urtis
181 A.D.2d 1001 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Marciano v. Marciano
161 A.D.2d 1163 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Reck v. Reck
149 A.D.2d 934 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Weis v. Weis
138 A.D.2d 968 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Stagliano v. Stagliano
132 A.D.2d 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A.D.2d 983, 513 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-green-nyappdiv-1987.