Green v. Green

Supreme Court of Georgia

Green v. Green

230 S.E.2d 313, 237 Ga. 816, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1402

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 26, 1976·No. 31502·Published

Opinion

Per curiam.

The husband enumerates three errors in the order of the Barrow Superior Court awarding the wife temporary alimony. We have reviewed the enumerations and the evidence before the trial court and find no reversible error.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Submitted September 3, 1976 Decided October 26, 1976. Hudson & Montgomery, David R. Montgomery, for appellant. Paris & Burkett, James Paris, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

The husband enumerates three errors in the order of the Barrow Superior Court awarding the wife temporary alimony. We have reviewed the enumerations and the evidence before the trial court and find no reversible error.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Submitted September 3, 1976 Decided October 26, 1976. Hudson & Montgomery, David R. Montgomery, for appellant. Paris & Burkett, James Paris, for appellee.

Green v. Green, 230 S.E.2d 313, 237 Ga. 816, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1402 (Ga. 1976).

Pincite

230 S.E.2d 313 (Green v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.