Green v. Green

Supreme Court of Georgia

Green v. Green

152 S.E. 573, 170 Ga. 292, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 439

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 18, 1930

DocketNo. 7409

StatusPublished

This text of 152 S.E. 573 (Green v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. Green, 152 S.E. 573, 170 Ga. 292, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 439 (Ga. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

In overruling the motion for new trial in this case the trial judge stated: “Movant having waived expressly all grounds of the motion for new trial except grounds 4, 5, and 6 of the motion; after hearing upon said grounds, no others being insisted on or considered, the motion is overruled and a new trial denied.” Plaintiff in error in his brief in this court argues only one question raised in his motion for new trial, viz., that the amount of alimony awarded is excessive, and that there is no evidence showing that the defendant could pay such an amount of alimony. All grounds of the motion for new trial not argued will be considered' abandoned. In view of the record and the evidence in this case, we can not say that the court erred in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All Ihe Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

In overruling the motion for new trial in this case the trial judge stated: “Movant having waived expressly all grounds of the motion for new trial except grounds 4, 5, and 6 of the motion; after hearing upon said grounds, no others being insisted on or considered, the motion is overruled and a new trial denied.” Plaintiff in error in his brief in this court argues only one question raised in his motion for new trial, viz., that the amount of alimony awarded is excessive, and that there is no evidence showing that the defendant could pay such an amount of alimony. All grounds of the motion for new trial not argued will be considered' abandoned. In view of the record and the evidence in this case, we can not say that the court erred in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All Ihe Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 S.E. 573, 170 Ga. 292, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-green-ga-1930.