Green v. Green

Supreme Court of Florida

Green v. Green

264 So. 2d 838, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3582

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 12, 1972·No. No. 41958·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

Green v. Green, 264 So. 2d 838, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3582 (Fla. 1972).

Pincite

264 So. 2d 838 (Green v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related