Green v. Golden Poultry Company, Inc.

772 So. 2d 1177, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 406, 2000 WL 868539
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Green v. Golden Poultry Company, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 191
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided June 30, 2000·No. 2980090·Published

Opinion

After Remand from the Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Golden Poultry Co., 772 So.2d 1175 (Ala. 2000). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and this case is remanded to the trial court for that court “to determine whether Green met her burden of proving [1178]*1178that her work activities aggravated or exacerbated a preexisting condition so as to produce a disability, and, if so, for further orders or proceedings not inconsistent with” the Supreme Court’s opinion. Ex parte Golden Poultry, 772 So.2d at 1177.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. Golden Poultry Company, Inc., 772 So. 2d 1177, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 406, 2000 WL 868539 (Ala. Ct. App. 2000).

772 So. 2d 1177 (Green v. Golden Poultry Company, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Golden Poultry Co., Inc.
772 So. 2d 1175 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2000)