Green v. . Gladstone

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Green v. . Gladstone

156 S.E. 927, 200 N.C. 347, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 326

DecidedFebruary 18, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 156 S.E. 927 (Green v. . Gladstone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. . Gladstone, 156 S.E. 927, 200 N.C. 347, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 326 (N.C. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The admission of the plaintiffs that the issue of indebtedness might be answered in the sum of $384 with interest from 26 January, 1929, which was done, brings the case under the decisions in Waters v. Garris, 188 N. C., 305, 124 S. E., 334, and Miller v. Dunn, 188 N. C., 397, 124 S. E., 746, and renders the questions relative to forfeiture of interest and penalty for usury, debated on brief, academic, at least so far as the present record is concerned.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stacy, C. J.

The admission of the plaintiffs that the issue of indebtedness might be answered in the sum of $384 with interest from 26 January, 1929, which was done, brings the case under the decisions in Waters v. Garris, 188 N. C., 305, 124 S. E., 334, and Miller v. Dunn, 188 N. C., 397, 124 S. E., 746, and renders the questions relative to forfeiture of interest and penalty for usury, debated on brief, academic, at least so far as the present record is concerned.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 S.E. 927, 200 N.C. 347, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-gladstone-nc-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack