Green v. Geluso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Green v. Geluso

27 A.D.2d 806, 280 N.Y.S.2d 530, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4709

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 7, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 806 (Green v. Geluso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. Geluso, 27 A.D.2d 806, 280 N.Y.S.2d 530, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4709 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment in favor of plaintiffs unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, the verdict vacated and a new trial granted, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiff Rochelle Green stipulates to accept $4,500 in -lieu of the verdict in her favor and plaintiff Sonya iStrauss accepts $7,500 in lieu of the verdict in her favor, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent and is affirmed as thus modified, without costs and without disbursements. It is evident that the amount of the jury’s verdict is grossly excessive and that any award in excess of the amounts indicated is not warranted by the record. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Tilzer and MoNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment in favor of plaintiffs unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, the verdict vacated and a new trial granted, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiff Rochelle Green stipulates to accept $4,500 in -lieu of the verdict in her favor and plaintiff Sonya iStrauss accepts $7,500 in lieu of the verdict in her favor, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent and is affirmed as thus modified, without costs and without disbursements. It is evident that the amount of the jury’s verdict is grossly excessive and that any award in excess of the amounts indicated is not warranted by the record. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Tilzer and MoNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 806, 280 N.Y.S.2d 530, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-geluso-nyappdiv-1967.