Green v. Felton
This text of 89 N.E. 320 (Green v. Felton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On Motion to Retax Costs.
Appellees severally move that the court retax the sum of $176.30, the same being the alleged amount paid the official stenographer of the Rush Circuit Court by appellants for the transcript of the evidence in said cause.
The motion is predicated upon four causes. Prom the fourth it appears that said official stenographer had taxed in his favor in the Rush Circuit Court the sum of $176.30 for making said transcript. Appellants denied that that amount was due, and made a motion to have said costs retaxed. The [322]*322stenographer was summoned, and the amount due to said stenographer was submitted to the Rush Circuit Court, Which rendered judgment that said stenographer should receive the sum of $100 for said transcript, and that he should refund all over that amount.
The judgment of the Rush Circuit Court is binding on the parties. The clerk of this court is therefore directed to modify said item of $176.30, by retaxing the same at $100. Said motion as to other causes is overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 N.E. 320, 44 Ind. App. 321, 1909 Ind. App. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-felton-indctapp-1909.