Green v. Durboraw

304 F. App'x 172
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 22, 2008
DocketNo. 08-6379
StatusPublished

This text of 304 F. App'x 172 (Green v. Durboraw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green v. Durboraw, 304 F. App'x 172 (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Georgia Green appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) for failure to properly exhaust administrative remedies. In her informal brief, Green fails to address this dispositive issue. Therefore, Green has waived appellate review of that issue. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (limiting review to issues raised in the informal brief); see also Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 n. 6 (4th Cir.1999) (finding failure to raise issue in opening brief constituted abandonment of that issue). Accordingly, we modify the district court’s order to reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice, and affirm the order as modified. See Green v. Durboraw, No. 8:06-cv-01608-PJM (D.Md. Jan. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edwards v. City of Goldsboro
178 F.3d 231 (Fourth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
304 F. App'x 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-durboraw-ca4-2008.