Green v. Durboraw
This text of 304 F. App'x 172 (Green v. Durboraw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Georgia Green appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) for failure to properly exhaust administrative remedies. In her informal brief, Green fails to address this dispositive issue. Therefore, Green has waived appellate review of that issue. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (limiting review to issues raised in the informal brief); see also Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 n. 6 (4th Cir.1999) (finding failure to raise issue in opening brief constituted abandonment of that issue). Accordingly, we modify the district court’s order to reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice, and affirm the order as modified. See Green v. Durboraw, No. 8:06-cv-01608-PJM (D.Md. Jan. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
304 F. App'x 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-durboraw-ca4-2008.