Green v. Donaldson
This text of 16 Vt. 162 (Green v. Donaldson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This case must be decided from what appears upon the bill of exceptions. If the testimony objected to has any legal tendency to prove the issue, in any reasonably supposable state of the testimony, as detailed in the bill of exceptions, it will be im[164]*164possible for us to say that it was improperly received. When it is stated, as in the present case, that the plaintiff gave evidence tending'to prove the “ various allegations as mentioned in his declaration,” we must conclude that by this is intended all the allegations in the declaration, and to the full extent. If we understand less than this, we shall hardly know where to stop.
The plaintiff, then, having given evidence to show that the wood was mostly unsound and rotten, crooked, &c., the defendant offered testimony to show that the timber standing on the land from which this was cut, “ was a good, fair lot of timber.” How, then, is it possible to say that such timber, when cut, should have made wood mostly unsound and rotten, and crooked, .unless by some artificial process? Judgment affirmed,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Vt. 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-donaldson-vt-1844.