Green v. Doane

1 Cal. Unrep. 86
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedMay 4, 1860
DocketNo. 2741
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Cal. Unrep. 86 (Green v. Doane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green v. Doane, 1 Cal. Unrep. 86 (Cal. 1860).

Opinion

FIELD, C. J.

— The appeal in this case is from the order refusing a new trial and from the final judgment. The motion for the new trial was refused on the application of the plaintiff, no one appearing on behalf of the defendant in its support. The failure thus to prosecute was a virtual abandonment of the motion, and the order made thereon was not, upon the authority of Mahoney v. Wilson [15 Cal. 42], decided at the January term, and of Frank v. Doane [15 Cal. 302], decided at the present term, a subject of review in this court. Upon the appeal from the final judgment there is no statement, and the ease before us rests, therefore, upon the judgment-roll, and as this discloses no error, an affirmance of the judgment must follow; and such affirmance is ordered.

We concur: Baldwin, J.; Cope, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vivianne Jade Washington v. Investigator Hugh Howard
25 F.4th 891 (Eleventh Circuit, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cal. Unrep. 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-doane-cal-1860.