Green v. Conroy

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 30, 2002
Docket02-6185
StatusUnpublished

This text of Green v. Conroy (Green v. Conroy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green v. Conroy, (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6185

DARRYL GREEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PATRICK CONROY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 02-92-DKC)

Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 30, 2002

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryl Green, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Darryl Green appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint and

dismissing without prejudice the complaint insofar as if could be

construed as having been filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Green v. Conroy, No. CA-02-92-DKC (D.

Md. Jan. 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Green v. Conroy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-conroy-ca4-2002.