Green v. Conroy

Fourth Circuit

Green v. Conroy

33 F. App'x 132

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2002·No. No. 02-6185·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Darryl Green appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint and dismissing without prejudice the complaint insofar as if could be construed as having been filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Green v. Conroy, No. CA-02-92-DKC (D.Md. Jan. 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [133] the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Darryl Green appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint and dismissing without prejudice the complaint insofar as if could be construed as having been filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Green v. Conroy, No. CA-02-92-DKC (D.Md. Jan. 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [133] the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Green v. Conroy, 33 F. App'x 132 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

33 F. App'x 132 (Green v. Conroy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related