Green v. Commonwealth

195 S.E. 520, 170 Va. 619, 1938 Va. LEXIS 215
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedMarch 10, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 195 S.E. 520 (Green v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green v. Commonwealth, 195 S.E. 520, 170 Va. 619, 1938 Va. LEXIS 215 (Va. 1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Easter Green was convicted in the Circuit Court of Mecklenburg county of the illegal possession of whiskey and her [620]*620punishment fixed by a jury at a fine of $50.00 and confinement in jail for ninety days.

The accused had been convicted before the trial justice of the county and her punishment, fixed by him, was the same as that later fixed by the jury.

There appeared on the back of the warrant, the following, which had been written there by the trial justice: “Plea of not guilty, $50.00 fine and costs and 90 days in jail. 5-7-37.” Just before the jury retired to consider of its verdict, counsel for accused moved that the warrant showing the punishment fixed by the trial justice be withheld from them because his finding was illegal evidence which should not be disclosed to the jury. This request was refused. The warrant, with the finding of the trial justice, was given to the jury and they arrived at the identical punishment which had been meted out to her by him.

The court is of opinion that upon a trial of an appeal from a trial justice, it is improper for the jury to be informed of the quantum of punishment given an accused by the trial justice. Code, section 4989, as amended by Acts 1932, ch. 172, and section 4990 provide that such an appeal must be tried de novo. When the warrant with the finding of the trial justice written thereon was given to the jury in this case, it effectually told the jury how much punishment he had given the accused. For this error, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for a new trial.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mawyer v. Commonwealth
128 S.E.2d 433 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1962)
Moulden v. State
142 A.2d 595 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1958)
Swift v. Commonwealth
100 S.E.2d 9 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1957)
Gravely v. Deeds
40 S.E.2d 175 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1946)
Burford v. Commonwealth
20 S.E.2d 509 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1942)
Mack v. Commonwealth
15 S.E.2d 62 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1941)
Malouf v. City of Roanoke
13 S.E.2d 319 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 S.E. 520, 170 Va. 619, 1938 Va. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-commonwealth-va-1938.