Green v. Combined Life Insurance

69 A.D.3d 531, 892 N.Y.2d 760
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 28, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 69 A.D.3d 531 (Green v. Combined Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green v. Combined Life Insurance, 69 A.D.3d 531, 892 N.Y.2d 760 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Plaintiff alleges he was defamed by defendant Downie’s written report to the insurer defendants of his interview with and examination of plaintiff. Even if defamatory, the statements are protected by a qualified privilege because they were made in a medical report to the insurer (see Gould v Broad, 22 AD2d 800 [1964], affd 16 NY2d 666 [1965]). Plaintiffs conclusory allegations of malice are insufficient to overcome the privilege (see Ferguson v Sherman Sq. Realty Corp., 30 AD3d 288 [2006]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., McGuire, Moskowitz, Freedman and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Appadurai
2023 NY Slip Op 01237 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Abbitt v. Carrube
2018 NY Slip Op 1394 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 A.D.3d 531, 892 N.Y.2d 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-combined-life-insurance-nyappdiv-2010.