Green v. Combined Life Insurance
This text of 69 A.D.3d 531 (Green v. Combined Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff alleges he was defamed by defendant Downie’s written report to the insurer defendants of his interview with and examination of plaintiff. Even if defamatory, the statements are protected by a qualified privilege because they were made in a medical report to the insurer (see Gould v Broad, 22 AD2d 800 [1964], affd 16 NY2d 666 [1965]). Plaintiffs conclusory allegations of malice are insufficient to overcome the privilege (see Ferguson v Sherman Sq. Realty Corp., 30 AD3d 288 [2006]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., McGuire, Moskowitz, Freedman and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 A.D.3d 531, 892 N.Y.2d 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-combined-life-insurance-nyappdiv-2010.