Green v. City of Stuart

101 F.2d 309, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 4375
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Green v. City of Stuart. Read the opinion of the Court — 81 F.2d 968
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 18, 1939·No. No. 8843·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the last appeal of this case to this court, 91 F.2d 603, the mandate was “that the judgment of the District Court in this’ cause be, and the same is hereby, reversed, and that this cause be and it is hereby remanded to the said District Court with directions to dismiss the suit for want of jurisdiction.” This the District Court did, but in addition it ordered set aside a judgment which had previously been entered in the District Court after a reversal by this court. 81 F.2d 968. The judgment in the District Court of dismissal for lack of jurisdiction was in accordance with the mandate, and presents no possible error. The additional order setting aside the prior proceedings in the case, while not directed by this court, was a necessary consequence of it. The District Court, having no jurisdiction, could not possibly have rendered any binding judgment. It was proper for the District Court so to declare,, and to expunge from its records the judgment improperly entered.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. City of Stuart, 101 F.2d 309, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 4375 (5th Cir. 1939).

101 F.2d 309 (Green v. City of Stuart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. City of Stuart
81 F.2d 968 (Fifth Circuit, 1936)
City of Stuart v. Green
91 F.2d 603 (Fifth Circuit, 1937)