Green v. Church of Immaculate Conception

248 A.D. 757
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1936·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Judgment dismissing complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Defendant owed plaintiff — an invitee — a duty of reasonable care. (Vaughan v. Transit Development Co., 222 N. Y. 79; Hudson v. Church of Holy Trinity, 250 id. 513.) While defendant was subject to no statutory duty to keep the vestibule and stairway lighted, it was for the jury to say whether defendant was negligent and the plaintiff free from contributory negligence. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. Church of Immaculate Conception, 248 A.D. 757 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

248 A.D. 757 (Green v. Church of Immaculate Conception) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Mello v. Saint Thomas the Apostle Church Corp.
165 A.2d 500 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1960)
Kiernan v. Roman Catholic Church of St. John Evangelist
11 A.D.2d 997 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Grant v. United States
271 F.2d 651 (Second Circuit, 1959)