Green v. Church of Immaculate Conception
Opinion
Judgment dismissing complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Defendant owed plaintiff — an invitee — a duty of reasonable care. (Vaughan v. Transit Development Co., 222 N. Y. 79; Hudson v. Church of Holy Trinity, 250 id. 513.) While defendant was subject to no statutory duty to keep the vestibule and stairway lighted, it was for the jury to say whether defendant was negligent and the plaintiff free from contributory negligence. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
248 A.D. 757 (Green v. Church of Immaculate Conception) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.