Green v. Centech Group

Fourth Circuit

Green v. Centech Group

675 F. App'x 326

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 2, 2017·No. No. 16-2113·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daryl A. Green appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Green v. The Centech Grp., No. 1:16-cv-00753-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 25, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional pro cess.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daryl A. Green appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Green v. The Centech Grp., No. 1:16-cv-00753-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 25, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional pro cess.

AFFIRMED

Green v. Centech Group, 675 F. App'x 326 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

675 F. App'x 326 (Green v. Centech Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related