Green v. CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC

700 S.E.2d 741, 305 Ga. App. 843, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2943, 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 829
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 8, 2010
DocketA10A1123
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 700 S.E.2d 741 (Green v. CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green v. CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC, 700 S.E.2d 741, 305 Ga. App. 843, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2943, 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 829 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.

Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC (CPS), sued Grant Green to collect sums owed under an automobile sales contract between Green (purchaser) and Carey Paul Ford (seller). CPS alleged that it received an assignment of the contract rights and was therefore the real party in interest with the right to sue for the amount due. In his answer to the suit and response to CPS’s motion for summary judgment, Green contended that CPS failed to establish that it was the real party in interest to sue on the contract. We agree and reverse the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of CPS.

The record shows that Carey Paul Ford assigned its contract rights in writing to Union Acceptance Corporation. Thereafter, the record shows a written assignment of the contract rights from Union Acceptance Company, LLC to Professional Recovery Systems, LLC, which assigned the rights in writing to Cavalry SPV I, LLC, which assigned the rights in writing to CPS. Because nothing in the record shows an assignment of the contract rights from Union Acceptance Corporation to Union Acceptance Company, LLC, there is a break in the chain of written assignments necessary to establish that CPS was the real party in interest to bring the suit on the contract. Wirth v. Cach, LLC, 300 Ga. App. 488 (685 SE2d 433) (2009). Although CPS contends in its appellate brief that Union Acceptance Company, LLC is also known as Union Acceptance Corporation, there is nothing in *844 the record to support this contention.

Decided September 8, 2010. J. Ransom Wilkinson, for appellant. Sherwin P. Robin, Corinne A. McIntosh, for appellee.

In the absence of evidence showing that CPS received a valid assignment of contract rights making it the real party in interest to sue on the contract, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of CPS. Lau’s Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 (405 SE2d 474) (1991); Wirth, supra.

Judgment reversed.

Ellington and Doyle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sabrina Carden v. Unifund Ccr, LLC
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2019
LSREF2 Baron, LLC v. Alexander SRP Apartments, LLC
17 F. Supp. 3d 1289 (N.D. Georgia, 2014)
Greg W. Greenstein v. Bank of the Ozarks
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014
Greenstein v. Bank of Ozarks
757 S.E.2d 254 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)
Kensington Partners, LLC v. Beal Bank Nevada
715 S.E.2d 491 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2011)
Benson v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC
712 S.E.2d 83 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2011)
In Re Stephens
443 B.R. 225 (M.D. Georgia, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
700 S.E.2d 741, 305 Ga. App. 843, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2943, 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-cavalry-portfolio-services-llc-gactapp-2010.