Green v. Carey Transportation, Inc.

38 A.D.2d 711, 329 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5659
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 3, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 38 A.D.2d 711 (Green v. Carey Transportation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green v. Carey Transportation, Inc., 38 A.D.2d 711, 329 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5659 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 23, 1965, which (1) granted defendant’s motion to vacate plaintiffs’ notice of discovery and inspection and (2) denied plaintiffs’ cross motion to extend their time to complete pretrial proceedings. Order reversed, without costs; defendant’s motion denied; and plaintiffs’ cross motion granted. The discovery and inspection pursuant to plaintiffs’ notice dated April 5, 1965 shall proceed on a date to be fixed in a new written notice of not less than 10 days, to be given by plaintiffs. The papers disclose that discovery was sought by plaintiffs of an accident report made by defendant’s employee to defendant on the day of the accident which is the subject of this action. It is our opinion that under these circumstances the report was prepared for the benefit of the defendant employer in the ordinary course of its business and therefore was subject to full disclosure (Bloom v. New York City Tr. Auth., 20 A D 2d 687). The inference to be drawn from these facts is not rebutted by the mere conclusory allegation of defendant that the report was material prepared solely for litigation. Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. Nassau County Commission on Human Rights
117 A.D.2d 656 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Stein v. Trump Village Section No. 4, Inc.
118 Misc. 2d 344 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
Pataki v. Kiseda
80 A.D.2d 100 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Chaplin v. Pathmark Supermarkets
107 Misc. 2d 541 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Pinn v. Supermarkets General Corp.
104 Misc. 2d 1112 (Nassau County District Court, 1980)
Carlo v. Queens Transit Corp.
76 A.D.2d 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Braun v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
67 A.D.2d 898 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 A.D.2d 711, 329 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-carey-transportation-inc-nyappdiv-1972.