Green v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

E.D. California

Green v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

District Court, E.D. California·Decided January 2, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-01108·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LORENZO GREEN, Case No. 1:23-cv-01108-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO TERMINATE CALIFORNIA v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, THE STATE OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA, AND WARDEN STEVE CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, SMITH AS PARTIES IN THIS ACTION et al., (ECF No. 16) Defendants.

On December 29, 2023, Plaintiff and Defendants California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), D. Contreras, J. Rodrigues, S. McHoul, State of California, Steve Smith, W. Velasquez, and W. Whitley, filed a stipulated notice of dismissal of Defendants CDCR and State of California with prejudice, and Defendant Steve Smith without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (ECF No. 16.) The parties stipulate that each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorneys’ fees. (Id.) Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or all of his claims—through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice.”)). The Court notes that Rule 41(a)(1)(A)Gi) provides that a “plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Despite the instant stipulated dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)G, no Defendant has filed an answer or motion for summary judgment in this action. Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)() a “plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (4) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendants CDCR, State of California, and Warden Steve Smith, as defendants in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le Dated: _January 2, 2024 _ ef UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LORENZO GREEN, Case No. 1:23-cv-01108-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO TERMINATE CALIFORNIA v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, THE STATE OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA, AND WARDEN STEVE CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, SMITH AS PARTIES IN THIS ACTION et al., (ECF No. 16) Defendants.

On December 29, 2023, Plaintiff and Defendants California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), D. Contreras, J. Rodrigues, S. McHoul, State of California, Steve Smith, W. Velasquez, and W. Whitley, filed a stipulated notice of dismissal of Defendants CDCR and State of California with prejudice, and Defendant Steve Smith without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (ECF No. 16.) The parties stipulate that each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorneys’ fees. (Id.) Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or all of his claims—through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice.”)). The Court notes that Rule 41(a)(1)(A)Gi) provides that a “plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Despite the instant stipulated dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)G, no Defendant has filed an answer or motion for summary judgment in this action. Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)() a “plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (4) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendants CDCR, State of California, and Warden Steve Smith, as defendants in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le Dated: _January 2, 2024 _ ef UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Green v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Pincite

Green v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (Green v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related