Green v. Cady

9 Wend. 414
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1832·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Nelson, J.

Without enquiring whether this religious society was duly incorporated, or not, I am of opinion that the plaintiffs had sufficient possession of the meeting house to entitle-them to maintain trespass against the defendant. Admitting that they were not legally trustees in pursuance of the provisions of the act regulating the incorporation of religious societies, 2 R. L. 212, they were trustees de facto and as such, had possession of the house according to the fourth section of that act; and that possession being under colour of right, was sufficient to entitle them to bring a suit against a trespasser. 9 Johns. R. 147.

Judgment affirmed, with double costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. Cady, 9 Wend. 414 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1832).

9 Wend. 414 (Green v. Cady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atlantic Trust Co. v. The Vigilancia
73 F. 452 (Second Circuit, 1896)
Roberts v. Hill
36 N.E. 843 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)
Mechanics National Bank v. H. C. Burnet Manufacturing Co.
32 N.J. Eq. 236 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1880)
Atlantic, Tennessee & Ohio Railroad v. Johnston
70 N.C. 348 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1874)