Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Green v. Butterworth

Green v. Butterworth

706 So. 2d 131, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2161, 1998 WL 88379
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 4, 1998
DocketNo. 98-0342
StatusPublished

This text of 706 So. 2d 131 (Green v. Butterworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green v. Butterworth, 706 So. 2d 131, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2161, 1998 WL 88379 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s second pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus on the grounds of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the grounds of laches. This Court previously denied the original petition without prejudice to petitioner filing a renewed petition in accordance with McCray v. State, 699 So.2d 1366 (Fla.1997). However, the renewed petition now filed falls short of the required statement under oath with specific factual basis that petitioner was affirmatively misled about the results of his appeal by counsel.

Therefore, this renewed petition is denied, with prejudice.

POLEN and GROSS, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCray v. State
699 So. 2d 1366 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
706 So. 2d 131, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2161, 1998 WL 88379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-butterworth-fladistctapp-1998.