Green v. Brinson Railway Co.
This text of 85 S.E. 931 (Green v. Brinson Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It being alleged in the petition that the plaintiff did not know of the defective conditions of the locomotive operated by him as an engineer of the defendant company, to which his injuries were directly attributed, and that his means of knowledge were not equal to those of the master, and it further appearing, from the allegations of the petition, that in order to make the necessary repairs on the locomotive, it was necessary for him to go under the engine, the movement of which caused the injuries complained of, and this movement, as alleged, being traceable to the negligence of the fireman, in disobedience of the engineer’s orders and in disregard of the fireman’s duty,.and questions of negligence and diligence being peculiarly for solution by the jury, a cause of action was set forth, and the trial judge erred in sustaining a general demurrer and dismissing the action. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 S.E. 931, 16 Ga. App. 639, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-brinson-railway-co-gactapp-1915.