Green v. Bontzolakes

83 A.D.3d 1401, 919 N.Y.S.2d 451
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 1, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 83 A.D.3d 1401 (Green v. Bontzolakes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green v. Bontzolakes, 83 A.D.3d 1401, 919 N.Y.S.2d 451 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Rosalie Bailey, J.), entered October 7, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded sole custody of the parties’ child to petitioner Norman E. Green and visitation to respondent Jacqueline Bontzolakes.

[1402]*1402It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: The mother of the child at issue, the respondent in proceeding Nos. 1 and 3 and the petitioner in proceeding No. 2, appeals from an order that, following a hearing, granted the petitions in proceeding Nos. 1 and 3. The father, by those petitions, alleged that the mother violated the provisions of a prior order of custody and visitation and sought to modify that order by awarding him sole custody of the parties’ daughter and granting visitation to the mother. Family Court also denied the mother’s petition in proceeding No. 2 seeking modification of the visitation provisions of the prior order. Contrary to the mother’s contention, the court properly awarded the father sole custody of the child (see Matter of Dubuque v Bremiller, 79 AD3d 1743 [2010]). “ ‘Generally, a court’s determination regarding custody and visitation issues, based upon a first-hand assessment of the credibility of the witnesses after an evidentiary hearing, is entitled to great weight and will not be set aside unless it lacks an evidentiary basis in the record’ ” (id. at 1744). We see no basis to disturb the court’s determination.

We have considered the mother’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Present—Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Nevin H. (Stephanie H.)
2018 NY Slip Op 5891 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
GUILLERMO, MARIA M. v. AGRAMONTE, DOMINGO A.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
Guillermo v. Agramonte
137 A.D.3d 1767 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
GREEN, NORMAN E. v. BONTZOLAKES, JACQUELINE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
Green v. Bontzolakes
111 A.D.3d 1282 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
CRUDELE, KERENSA v. WELLS, BRIAN
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
Crudele v. Wells
99 A.D.3d 1227 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
MARINO, JOHN C. v. MARINO, SHERRY L.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
Marino v. Marino
90 A.D.3d 1694 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
CANFIELD, DENISE M. v. CANFIELD, CHRISTOPHER V.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
Canfield v. Canfield
87 A.D.3d 1272 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 A.D.3d 1401, 919 N.Y.S.2d 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-bontzolakes-nyappdiv-2011.