Green v. Blanket

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Green v. Blanket

18 A.D.3d 278, 794 N.Y.S.2d 645, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5196

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 12, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 A.D.3d 278 (Green v. Blanket) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. Blanket, 18 A.D.3d 278, 794 N.Y.S.2d 645, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5196 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold B. Beeler, J.), entered June 29, 2004, which, in an action for dental malpractice, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict to the extent of directing a new trial on the issues of damages for past and future pain and suffering unless plaintiff stipulated to reduce the jury’s awards for past pain and suffering from $250,000 to $125,000 and for future pain and suffering from $100,000 to $25,000, unanimously modified, on the facts, to increase the amount to which plaintiff must stipulate with respect to past pain and suffering to $200,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The trial court’s reduction of damages is excessive to the extent indicated with respect to past pain and suffering (CFLR 5501 [c]). We have considered and rejected the parties’ other arguments for affirmative relief. Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Marlow and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold B. Beeler, J.), entered June 29, 2004, which, in an action for dental malpractice, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict to the extent of directing a new trial on the issues of damages for past and future pain and suffering unless plaintiff stipulated to reduce the jury’s awards for past pain and suffering from $250,000 to $125,000 and for future pain and suffering from $100,000 to $25,000, unanimously modified, on the facts, to increase the amount to which plaintiff must stipulate with respect to past pain and suffering to $200,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The trial court’s reduction of damages is excessive to the extent indicated with respect to past pain and suffering (CFLR 5501 [c]). We have considered and rejected the parties’ other arguments for affirmative relief. Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Marlow and Catterson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.3d 278, 794 N.Y.S.2d 645, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-blanket-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack