Green v. Beekman

New York Supreme Court

Green v. Beekman

2 Cow. 577

DecidedMay 15, 1824

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Cow. 577 (Green v. Beekman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. Beekman, 2 Cow. 577 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).

Pincite

Opinion

In partition. Story moved that moneys, paid into Court for the use of owners unknown, pursuant to the statute, (sess. 36, ch. 100, s. 7, 1 R. L. 511,) be paid over to two persons who claimed it. He produced proof that the proper notice of the motion had been given, and because the sum claimed by each was small, being but about $225, and it appeared that the claimants were men of large fortunes, the Court did not require the security to refund which they are authorized by the statute to demand in their discretion.

Rule accordingly.

Savage, Ch. J. was absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In partition. Story moved that moneys, paid into Court for the use of owners unknown, pursuant to the statute, (sess. 36, ch. 100, s. 7, 1 R. L. 511,) be paid over to two persons who claimed it. He produced proof that the proper notice of the motion had been given, and because the sum claimed by each was small, being but about $225, and it appeared that the claimants were men of large fortunes, the Court did not require the security to refund which they are authorized by the statute to demand in their discretion.

Rule accordingly.

Savage, Ch. J. was absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Cow. 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-beekman-nysupct-1824.