Green v. Bear Bros. & Hirsch

2 Posey 372
CourtTexas Commission of Appeals
DecidedJuly 1, 1882
DocketNo. 1174
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Posey 372 (Green v. Bear Bros. & Hirsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green v. Bear Bros. & Hirsch, 2 Posey 372 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1882).

Opinion

Opinion.— In disposing of this appeal it becomes necessary to construe that section of our statute giving to landlords a lien on the property of the tenant for rents due and [374]*374to become clue, for any residence or store-house or other buildings, in conjunction with the contract of lease upon which the appellant predicates his rights. See art. 3122, K. S.

The point presented bj?- appellant and urged as ground for reversal is this: That under the provisions of this contract of lease, and by virtue of the above article, he had a preference lien upon all the property of the tenant in the rented house for the payment of the rent due, accruing and to become due under contract. We do not so construe the statute. Such a construction would apply to a lease of fifty years as well as three years. As to writs of injunction, see K. S., art. 28S0. We are of the opinion that the court did not err in quashing the writ of sequestration and in dissolving the writ of injunction, and, as the court had no jurisdiction of appellant’s claim, it correctly sustained the demurrer and dismissed the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Posey 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-bear-bros-hirsch-texcommnapp-1882.