Green v. Beach Lumber Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Green v. Beach Lumber Co.

3 Conn. Supp. 61, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 106

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

DecidedOctober 24, 1935

DocketFile #35040

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Conn. Supp. 61 (Green v. Beach Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. Beach Lumber Co., 3 Conn. Supp. 61, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 106 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

BORDON, J.

I am not entirely satisfied that the plain' tiff’s innocence and not his negligence led to his failure to appear before the justice court. However, I would readily give him the benefit of the doubt were it not for the fact that I am convinced that he is liable for the payment of the bill.

The books of the defendant as well as the delivery slips all indicate definitely that the credit was extended to him.

In a new trial of the case the court could come to only one conclusion and that is that the plaintiff is indebted to the defendant in the amount for which judgment was obtained. For this reason it would be futile to grant a new trial.

The issues are found and judgment may be entered for the defendant to recover its costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BORDON, J.

I am not entirely satisfied that the plain' tiff’s innocence and not his negligence led to his failure to appear before the justice court. However, I would readily give him the benefit of the doubt were it not for the fact that I am convinced that he is liable for the payment of the bill.

The books of the defendant as well as the delivery slips all indicate definitely that the credit was extended to him.

In a new trial of the case the court could come to only one conclusion and that is that the plaintiff is indebted to the defendant in the amount for which judgment was obtained. For this reason it would be futile to grant a new trial.

The issues are found and judgment may be entered for the defendant to recover its costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Conn. Supp. 61, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-beach-lumber-co-pactcompl-1935.