Green v. Andrews

District Court, W.D. North Carolina·Decided December 23, 2019·No. 5:15-cv-00097·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION 5:15-cv-97-FDW (5:00-cr-34-1)

DAVID GLENN GREEN, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) ORDER JUSTIN F. ANDREWS, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________ ) THIS MATTER is before the Court on pro se Petitioner’s Motion for Relief from Judgment, (Doc. No. 17). Petitioner filed his pro se § 2241 petition in the instant case on July 28, 2015, and the Court denied the Motion in an Order docketed on March 9, 2016. (Doc. No. 9). Petitioner filed the instant Motion for Relief from Judgment under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on December 11, 2019. (Doc. No. 17). Petitioner will be required to file a Memorandum Addressing Limitations within 14 days of this Order explaining why his Rule 60(b) Motion is not time-barred. See generally United States v. McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 401 (4th Cir. 2015) (noting that the Rule 60(b) time limit is an affirmative defense). Petitioner’s failure to comply may result in the denial of the Rule 60(b) Motion without further notice. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Petitioner shall file a Memorandum Addressing Limitations within 14 days of this Order.

1 Signed: December 20, 2019

Frank D. Whitney é Chief United States District Judge ~“»**

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. Andrews, (W.D.N.C. 2019).

Green v. Andrews (Green v. Andrews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Madison McRae
793 F.3d 392 (Fourth Circuit, 2015)