Green v. Andrews

669 F. App'x 102
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 28, 2016
DocketNo. 16-6421
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 669 F. App'x 102 (Green v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green v. Andrews, 669 F. App'x 102 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Glenn Green appeals from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. Green contends that he is no longer a career offender after Johnson v. United States, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015). However, Green received a mandatory life sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3559(c) (2012). As such, his sentence was not driven by his career offender status. While Green contends that he was incorrectly sentenced under § 3559(c), we hold that this claim is not cognizable under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012), given the facts of Green’s case. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. Andrews
W.D. North Carolina, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
669 F. App'x 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-andrews-ca4-2016.