Green v. Akonik Label Group LLC

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------x : JUSTIN GREEN, : Plaintiff, : 19-CV-7492 (PGG) (OTW) : -against- : ORDER : AKONIK LABEL GROUP LLC, : : Defendant. : : -------------------------------------------------------------x ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge: This matter has been referred to me for Inquest following a default by Defendant Akonik Label Group LLC (“Defendant”). Accordingly, by March 13, 2020, Plaintiff shall serve on Defendant and file (1) proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and (2) an inquest memorandum setting forth proof of damages. The proposed findings of act and conclusions of law should show how the proposed damages figures are tied to the legal claims asserted and should show how the Court has jurisdiction over this matter and these defendants. Plaintiff’s proposed damages figures should be supported by documentary evidence and/or one or more affidavits, made by someone with personal knowledge, establishing the proposed figures. Any request for attorney’s fees and costs should also be supported by documentation. Plaintiff shall include with such service a copy of this Order and file a proof of service on the docket. Defendant’s opposition papers shall be filed by April 10, 2020. The Court hereby notifies the parties that it may conduct this inquest solely on the written submissions of the parties. See Action S.A. v. Marc Rich & Co., Inc., 951 F.2d 504, 508 (2d Cir. 1991). If any party seeks an evidentiary hearing on damages, such party must include the request in its papers, as well as provide reasons why a hearing is necessary and detail what types of additional evidence would be presented at the hearing.

SO ORDERED.

s/ Ona T. Wang Dated: February 27, 2020 Ona T. Wang New York, New York United States Magistrate Judge