Green Tree Servicing LLC v. Golden

CourtSuperior Court of Maine
DecidedSeptember 30, 2014
DocketCUMre-14-0108
StatusUnpublished

This text of Green Tree Servicing LLC v. Golden (Green Tree Servicing LLC v. Golden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green Tree Servicing LLC v. Golden, (Me. Super. Ct. 2014).

Opinion

ENI ERED OCT n 1 Z014

OF MA\NE STATE OF MAINE SiAIE ss c•.orks ,_ '' 0n1ce SUPERIOR COURT cumber\3n d . . CUMBERLAND, ss._ Docket No. RE-14-0108 S£P ':i u 7_0\~ C#M-PAC; Di-30-14 GREEN TREE SERVICING LLCOt==CE\VEO Pla~~tr" ORDER ON MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME AND DIRECTING THE PLAINTIFF TO JOIN THE REAL PARTY -IN-INTEREST PURSUANT TO M.R. CIV. P. 17(a) MARK T. GOLDEN AND CYNTHIA N. GOLDEN AKA CYNTHIA GOLDEN, Defendants

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC, AS NOMINEE FOR BARTON MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Party-in-interest

Before the Court is a motion by the Plaintiff to enlarge the time in which it must serve

Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) as a party-in-interest.' See M.R. Civ. P.

3, 6(b). Because the .Plaintiff has provided good cause and filed the motion prior to the

expiration of the ninety-day deadline contained in M.R. Civ. P. 3, the Plaintiffs motion is

GRANTED. See M.R. Civ. P. 6(b).

However, a review of the Plaintiffs amended complaint and the documents filed with it

suggest that the Plaintiff is not the real party-in-interest and lacks standing to seek foreclosure of

the Defendant's mortgage pursuant to Bank ofAm., N.A. v. Greenleaf, 2014 ME 89, ~~ 12-17,---

A.3d ---. The documents demonstrate that the Defendant originally executed the mortgage in

favor of GMAC Bank with MERS as nominee on April 23, 2003. Then, on October 5, 2010,

1 The Court questions whether MERS, as nominee for Bartlett Mortgage, is the appropriate party-in-interest to join in light of the Green/eqfdecision. 2014 ME 89, ~~ 12-17, --- A.3d ---. MERS, as nominee for Ally Bank, F/K/A GMAC Bank, assigned the mortgage to Federal

National Mortgage Association (FNMA). FNMA then assigned the mortgage to GMAC

Mortgage, LLC on July 13, 2012. And finally, on May 20, 2013, GMAC Mortgage, LLC

assigned the mortgage to the Plaintiff, Green Tree Servicing, LLC. Because the Plaintiff's

interest in the mortgage stems from an assignment from MERS, as nominee for the original

lender, the Plaintiff lacks sufficient "ownership" of the mortgage because MERS, the original

assignor, was not the owner of the mortgage and thus could not convey such an interest to any

other party. !d. Because the Plaintiff does not own the mortgage, it lacks standing to foreclose.

!d. And, as standing relates to the Court's jurisdiction, the Court may address the issue sua

sponte. See JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Harp, 2011 ME 5, ~ 7, 10 A.3d 718 ("[S]tanding relates to

the court's subject matter jurisdiction and may be raised at any time, including during an

appeal."); Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc. v. Saunders, 2010 ME 79,~~ 15, 26, 2 A.3d 289

("Without possession of or any interest in the note, MERS lacked standing to institute

foreclosure proceedings and could not invoke the jurisdiction of our trial courts."); Ewing v. Me.

Dist. Court, 2009 ME 16, ~ 12, 964 A.2d 644; Francis v. Dana-Cummings, 2007 ME 17, ~ 20,

915 A.2d 412 (stating that it is "well-settled law that a court may notice and act on a question

regarding its authority or jurisdiction at any time, either on its own motion or on motion of any

party"); In re Walter R., 2004 ME 151, ~ 3, 863 A.2d 276; Collins v. State, 2000 ME 85, ~ 5, 750

A.2d 1257; see also M.R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (stating that "[w]henever it appears by suggestion of

the parties or otherwise that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter, the court shall

dismiss the action").

Accordingly, the Plaintiff has sixty days to join or substitute the real party-in-interest

pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 17(a). See Saunders, 2010 ME 79, ~ 17, 2 A.3d 289 (stating that M.R.

2 / I

Civ. P. 17(a) is appropriately invoked "to correct an action that was filed and then maintained by

the wrong party, or was filed in the name of the wrong party"); see also Harp, 2011 ME 5, ~ 12,

I 0 !\.3d 718. If the plaintiff fails to join or substitute the real party-in-interest or fails to

establish its standing as the owner of the mortgage within sixty (60) days the case will be

dismissed for lack of standing. See Greenleaf, 2014 ME 89, ~ 12, --- A.3d ---.

The entry shall be:

The plaintiff's motion for an enlargement of time is GRANTED. The plaintiff is

to join or substitute the real party-in-interest pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 17(a) within sixty (60)

days or the case will be dismissed. The Clerk is directed to incorporate this Order into the

docket by reference pursuant to Maine Rule of Civil Procedure 7

Dated: -¥ ~,~zoi(

3 GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC VS MARK T GOLDEN ET AL UTN:AOCSsr -2014-0023193 CASE #:PORSC-RE-2014-00108

01 0000003856 MORLEY LEONARD F JR 707 SABLE OAKS DRIVE STE ~50 SOUTH PORTLAND ME 04106 F GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC ; ;. .P.; ; ;L_ _ _ ___;;R..;.;;T;.;.N;.;;;D_----'-0..;;..3.:....(.;;;..2..;;..4:...../2;;;...0.:....1~4

ProS

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ewing v. Maine District Court
2009 ME 16 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2009)
In Re Walter R.
2004 ME 151 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2004)
Collins v. State
2000 ME 85 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2000)
Francis v. Dana-Cummings
2007 ME 16 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2007)
Batchelder v. Realty Resources Hospitality, LLC
2007 ME 17 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2007)
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Saunders
2010 ME 79 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2010)
JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Harp
2011 ME 5 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Green Tree Servicing LLC v. Golden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-tree-servicing-llc-v-golden-mesuperct-2014.