Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Gill

2021 NY Slip Op 03165, 144 N.Y.S.3d 390, 194 A.D.3d 913
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 19, 2021
DocketIndex No. 701554/15
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 03165 (Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Gill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Gill, 2021 NY Slip Op 03165, 144 N.Y.S.3d 390, 194 A.D.3d 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Green Tree Servicing, LLC v Gill (2021 NY Slip Op 03165)
Green Tree Servicing, LLC v Gill
2021 NY Slip Op 03165
Decided on May 19, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 19, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
BETSY BARROS
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2017-07946
(Index No. 701554/15)

[*1]Green Tree Servicing, LLC, respondent,

v

Wendell O. Gill, etc., et al., defendants, Marker Real Estate Corp., appellant.


Avi Rosenfeld, Lawrence, NY, for appellant.

Gross Polowy, LLC, Westbury, NY (Stephen J. Vargas of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Marker Real Estate Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Timothy J. Dufficy, J.), entered June 6, 2017. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted those branches of the plaintiff's unopposed motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against that defendant, to strike its answer, and for an order of reference.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The Supreme Court, in the order appealed from, granted the plaintiff's unopposed motion, inter alia, for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the appellant, to strike its answer, and for an order of reference. The record on appeal contains no evidence that the appellant ever timely opposed the motion. Accordingly, the appellant is precluded from challenging the propriety of that order on appeal (see CPLR 5511; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Harrigan, 179 AD3d 1142; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Estwick, 160 AD3d 911; Messina v City of New York, 147 AD3d 748). We therefore dismiss the appeal.

DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, BARROS and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Messina v. City of New York
2017 NY Slip Op 640 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Harrigan
2020 NY Slip Op 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 03165, 144 N.Y.S.3d 390, 194 A.D.3d 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-tree-servicing-llc-v-gill-nyappdiv-2021.