Green Point Savings Bank v. Central Gardens Unit No. 1
This text of 280 A.D. 987 (Green Point Savings Bank v. Central Gardens Unit No. 1) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for alleged breach of contract, defendant, a corporation, appeals from an order which denies its motion to vacate a notice of examination before trial, served by plaintiff, and directs that defendant, by its president and its agent, appear for such examination. Order modified on the law by deleting from the last ordering paragraph thereof the words “and Abraham Traub, its agent”, and as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The examination directed shall proceed on five days’ notice. It was improper to direct the examination of appellant corporation by one not alleged to be its agent at the time said notice was served or when said order was made. (Cohen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 243 App. Div. 776; McGowan V. Eastman, 271 N. Y. 195; Schwartz V. Brooklyn & Queens Tr. Corp., 260 App. Div. 947.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
280 A.D. 987, 116 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-point-savings-bank-v-central-gardens-unit-no-1-nyappdiv-1952.