Green Point Savings Bank v. Board of Zoning Appeals
309 U.S. 633, 60 S. Ct. 719
Opinion
The. motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; (2) Euclid v. Ambler, 272 U. S. 365; Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 274 U. S. 325; Lewis v. Mayor, 290 U. S. 585.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Green Point Savings Bank v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 309 U.S. 633, 60 S. Ct. 719 (1940).
309 U.S. 633 (Green Point Savings Bank v. Board of Zoning Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
New York Tennis Associates v. Town of Vestal
97 A.D.2d 899 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Turgeon v. Buffalo Common Council
78 A.D.2d 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Hausman v. Common Council of City of Syracuse
60 A.D.2d 770 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Frederico v. Moore
57 A.D.2d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Town of Cheektowaga v. Amico
58 Misc. 2d 103 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)
Lemir Realty Corp. v. Larkin
181 N.E.2d 407 (New York Court of Appeals, 1962)