Green Party of Hawaii v. Nago

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Green Party of Hawaii v. Nago. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 Haw. 228
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided March 10, 2016·No. SCWC-14-0001313·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0001313 10-MAR-2016 01:01 PM

SCWC-14-0001313

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

GREEN PARTY OF HAWAII, KAREN M. HOLT, ELIZABETH M. RUZE,

MICHAEL KRATZKE, MOANI KEALA AKAKA, KIM DUFFETT,

MARY JO DENNISON and MAKAʻALA KAʻAUMOANA,

Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs.

SCOTT NAGO, Chief Elections Office, State of Hawaiʻi,

and STATE OF HAWAIʻI,

Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-14-0001313; CIVIL NO. 12-1-0956(2))

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Application for

Writ of Certiorari, filed on January 27, 2016, is hereby

accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties

will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, March 10, 2016.

Lance D. Collins /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioners /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Kimberly Tsumoto Guidry /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna for respondents /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green Party of Hawaii v. Nago, (haw 2016).

Green Party of Hawaii v. Nago (Green Party of Hawaii v. Nago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.