Green, Marcus Anthony
This text of Green, Marcus Anthony (Green, Marcus Anthony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-28,344-37
EX PARTE MARCUS ANTHONY GREEN, AKA MARKUS ANTONIUS GREEN, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-01-904200-W IN THE 167TH DISTRICT COURT FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of practicing medicine without a license and sentenced to forty
years’ imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Green v. State, 137
S.W. 3d 356 (Tex. App. — Austin May 27, 2004) (pet. ref’d). Applicant filed this application
for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this
Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
In the instant application, Applicant alleges that his conviction violates the prohibition on
double jeopardy, that his conviction was obtained pursuant to an unconstitutional search and
seizure, and that he was denied due process and equal protection. Additionally, Applicant claims 2
that he was improperly denied release to discretionary mandatory supervision.
This Court has previously cited Applicant for abuse of the writ because Applicant
continues to raise grounds that were previously rejected on the merits or that should have been
raised in previous applications. When an applicant has been cited for abuse of the writ, we will
not consider the merits of the grounds in subsequently-filed applications unless the applicant
shows that the factual or legal basis of those grounds was unavailable in a previously filed
application. This Court has reviewed Applicant's claim that he was improperly denied release to
discretionary mandatory supervision and has determined that it is without merit. Therefore, it is
denied. Applicant's remaining claims are barred from review; as such, they are dismissed. Tex.
Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07 § 4.
Filed: April 27, 2022 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Green, Marcus Anthony, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-marcus-anthony-texcrimapp-2022.