Green, James Thomas
This text of Green, James Thomas (Green, James Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-48,559-18
EX PARTE JAMES THOMAS GREEN, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 715266-H IN THE 248TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and
sentenced to thirty-five years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his
conviction. Green v. State, No. 14-96-01536-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 28, 1999,
pet. ref’d)(not designated for publication).
In his present application, Applicant raises four grounds. This application, however, presents
a more serious question. This Court’s records reflect that Applicant has filed seven prior 2
applications pertaining to this conviction. It is obvious from the record that Applicant continues to
raise issues that have been presented and rejected in previous applications or that should have been
presented in previous applications. The writ of habeas corpus is not to be lightly or easily abused.
Sanders v. U.S., 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr, 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974).
Because of his repetitive claims, we hold that Applicant’s claims are barred from review under
Article 11.07, § 4, and are waived and abandoned by his abuse of the writ. This application is
dismissed.
Therefore, we instruct the Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals not to accept or file the
instant application for a writ of habeas corpus, or any future application pertaining to this conviction
unless Applicant is able to show in such an application that any claims presented have not been
raised previously and that they could not have been presented in a previous application for a writ of
habeas corpus. Ex parte Bilton, 602 S.W.2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980).
Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
Filed: January 30, 2019 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Green, James Thomas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-james-thomas-texcrimapp-2019.