Green Companies, Inc., of Florida v. Kendall Racquetball Investments, Ltd.
This text of 613 So. 2d 933 (Green Companies, Inc., of Florida v. Kendall Racquetball Investments, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Green Companies, Inc., of Florida appeals a final order entered after a jury verdict in favor of appellees Kendall Racquetball Investments, Ltd., and Scandinavian Health & Fitness Centers, Inc., defendants below.
We conclude that the trial court correctly interpreted this court’s decision in The Green Companies, Inc., of Florida v. Kendall Racquetball Investments, Ltd., 560 So.2d 1208 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). This court’s prior decision set forth the applicable contractual principles and remanded for further proceedings in light thereof. The prior decision did not preclude defendants’ offering equitable defenses after remand, but instead contemplated that equitable defenses would be considered in light of the parties’ contractual obligations as stated in this court’s opinion. There was therefore no impediment to the defendants’ offering the equitable defenses of waiver and estop-pel at the subsequent separate trial on damages.
After careful consideration of appellant’s points on appeal, we conclude that no reversible error has been shown. The order under review is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
613 So. 2d 933, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1282, 1993 WL 20253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-companies-inc-of-florida-v-kendall-racquetball-investments-ltd-fladistctapp-1993.