Green, Charles Anthony

CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJune 19, 2015
DocketPD-0752-15
StatusPublished

This text of Green, Charles Anthony (Green, Charles Anthony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green, Charles Anthony, (Tex. 2015).

Opinion

PD-0752-15 CASE No. 02-I4-GG426-CR

CHARLES A. GREEN, Petitioner § IN THE COURT OF

vs. § CRIMINAL APPEALS § • THE STATE OF TEXAS, Respondent § AUSTIN, TEXAS.

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 60-DAY's TIME TO FILE POST DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

To; The Honorable Justices of said Court:

Comes Now, Charles A. Green, petitioner, pro-se, and files his motion request- FiUED IN ing for a "60-day" extension of time to file his Post Discre^ionae^Re^v-iew..PDR motion into the Court. He shows the Court the following: v, , „ __._ Jud 19 2015 ONE A^' Acosta, Clerk Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

Rule 68.2(c) Extension of Time.

The Court of Criminal Appeals may extend the time to file a petition for dis

cretionary review if a party files a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b) no later

than 15-day's after the last day for filing the petition.

TWO

Rule 10.5(b)(1)

(A) The deadline for filing petition for post discretionary review is July 4,

2015.

(B) The petitioner request for a 69-day's extension to file_chiiSJ.ia©stfc(|iscretion- •oFCBvEOw ary review petition. ^sfToFCP*MNM ApPEM-$

(i) (C) The fact's relied on by the petitioner Green for extension of 60-day's

to file his PDR is that he is in the process of purchasing his trial record's

for around about $500.00.

He knows the rules of appellate procedure that he can not raise no additional

ground's, no more then what has been raised on direct appeal. The petitioner

Green is not on a fishing trip, but he effectively wants to "direct the Court of

Criminal Appeals" there is error on record, and where the error occurred of the

Court of Appeals errored on review of his appeal. The petitioner Green is ignor

ant in the law, but in a "common sense" review of the record, he can direct the

Court of Criminal Appeals on record the court of Appeals errored in it's review

of the appellant Green's direct appeal.

Therefore, the extension of 60-day's will provide a sufficienttime, and no

need for more time for him to prepare his petition for discretionary review.

(D) No other extension of time has been requested, and the petitioner does not

anticipate he will make another request.

PRAYER

The petitioner Charles A. Green prays that the Honorable Court will grant his motion for extended time of 60-day1s to file his petition for discretionary review.

June 14, 2015

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED

f)w&j/ (L htepj*. CHARLES A. GREEN

#1959504 WYNNE UNIT

810 FM 2821

HUNTSVILLE, TEXAS.

77349..

(2)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Green, Charles Anthony, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-charles-anthony-tex-2015.