Greely v. Wainwright

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided May 4, 2010·No. Civil Action No. 2010-0694·Published

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAY 04 2010 Clerk, U.S. District ana Bankruptcy Courts Ernest M. Greeley Jr., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) S.T. Wainwright, ) ) Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the court on the plaintiffs application to proceed without

prepayment of fees, and his pro se habeas petition. The Court will grant the application will

dismiss the habeas petition for lack of jurisdiction.

Plaintiff is detained in the District of Columbia Jail. He states that "[t]he judge found

probable cause to violate" on March 4,2010. Petition at "4.") Although the petition attacks a

conviction as unconstitutional, it does not indicate which court imposed sentence on the basis of

the challenged conviction, or whether the petitioner has exhausted his state remedies, if his

conviction was imposed by a state court. Without such information, this court cannot determine

whether it has subject matter jurisdiction. As petitioner has not alleged facts sufficient to

establish subject matter jurisdiction, the petition will be dismissed without prejudice for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction. A separate final order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

Date: ~ ;l.)..., )..0 ( '0 ~ge ) The page is identified as page 4 in the petition, but pages 2 and 3 are missing.

N 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greely v. Wainwright, (D.D.C. 2010).

Greely v. Wainwright (Greely v. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.