Greely v. Wainwright
Opinion
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAY 04 2010 Clerk, U.S. District ana Bankruptcy Courts Ernest M. Greeley Jr., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) S.T. Wainwright, ) ) Respondent. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter comes before the court on the plaintiffs application to proceed without
prepayment of fees, and his pro se habeas petition. The Court will grant the application will
dismiss the habeas petition for lack of jurisdiction.
Plaintiff is detained in the District of Columbia Jail. He states that "[t]he judge found
probable cause to violate" on March 4,2010. Petition at "4.") Although the petition attacks a
conviction as unconstitutional, it does not indicate which court imposed sentence on the basis of
the challenged conviction, or whether the petitioner has exhausted his state remedies, if his
conviction was imposed by a state court. Without such information, this court cannot determine
whether it has subject matter jurisdiction. As petitioner has not alleged facts sufficient to
establish subject matter jurisdiction, the petition will be dismissed without prejudice for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction. A separate final order accompanies this memorandum opinion.
Date: ~ ;l.)..., )..0 ( '0 ~ge ) The page is identified as page 4 in the petition, but pages 2 and 3 are missing.
N 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Greely v. Wainwright (Greely v. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.