Greeley v. Maine Central R. R.

53 Me. 200
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1865
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 53 Me. 200 (Greeley v. Maine Central R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greeley v. Maine Central R. R., 53 Me. 200 (Me. 1865).

Opinion

Danforth, J.

From the statement of facts, it appears that the injury complained of arises from the turning of mere surface water, — that which accumulated from rains and melting snows, — from its accustomed course upon land of plaintiff. This being caused by erections upon defendants’ laud authorized by law, no action will lie. Dickenson v. Worcester, 7 Allen, 19; Flagg v. same, 13 Gray, 601; Barry v. Lowell, 8 Allen, 127; Parks v. Newburyport, 10 Gray, 28, and cases cited. Judgment for defendants.

Appleton, C. J., Cutting, Walton, Dickerson and Barrows, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Franklin v. Durgee
58 L.R.A. 112 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1901)
Egener v. New York & Rockaway Beach Railway Co.
73 N.Y. St. Rep. 779 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Gillison v. City of Charleston
16 W. Va. 282 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1880)
Eaton v. B. C. & M. R. R.
51 N.H. 504 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 Me. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greeley-v-maine-central-r-r-me-1865.